![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Specification | Yonex Astrox 77 Tour | Li-Ning Axforce 100 II |
| Flex | medium | stiff |
| Balance | Head Heavy | Head Heavy |
| Weight / Grip | 3U / G4,G5,G6 4U / G5,G6 | 3U / G5 4U / G5 |
| Max Tension | 3U: 29 lbs 4U: 28 lbs | 3U: 31 lbs 4U: 30 lbs |
The flex rating of a racket influences how power is generated and how the shuttle responds at contact. It plays a major role in playability, especially during smashes, drives, and defensive lifts.
Astrox 77 Tour features a medium shaft, while Axforce 100 II uses a stiff shaft. Medium flex rackets provide a balance between accuracy and repulsion. They are well-suited for intermediate players transitioning to higher levels or those who want a racket that works for both power and control without specializing too strongly in one direction. By comparison, Stiff shafts suit players who already generate power with strong technique. They offer cleaner shuttle response, better directional accuracy on drives, and enable tighter placement during attacking play. However, they demand more physical input, so beginners may find them less forgiving if contact timing is late..
Players who hit with full-body rotation and strong wrist snap may benefit more from the characteristics of Axforce 100 II, while those who prefer rallies, longer games and effortless depth will appreciate the support offered by Axforce 100 II.
| Flexible | Medium | Stiff | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Astrox 77 Tour | |||
| Axforce 100 II |
Balance affects swing sensation, shot recovery, and how easily power transfers into the shuttle. Even a similar weight racket can feel completely different depending on where the mass is distributed.
Both rackets share a head heavy balance profile, meaning their weight distribution philosophy is similar. Head-heavy rackets shift more mass toward the frame, increasing momentum behind smashes and clears. Players who dominate from the rear court or rely on offensive pressure benefit most. However, head-heavy setups may feel slower when switching quickly between forehand and backhand defense.. In this case, differences in performance will rely more on flex, weight class, and tension settings rather than balance alone.
| Head Light | Even | Head Heavy | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yonex Astrox 77 Tour | |||
| Li-Ning Axforce 100 II |
The weight class determines how quickly a racket moves during defense and how much stability it has during smashes. Lighter frames accelerate faster, while heavier ones provide more impact stability.
Both rackets are offered in similar weight categories (3U, 4U). Because weight classes align closely, power and speed differences will likely be subtle and influenced more by flex, balance and string setup than pure mass.
| 2U | 3U | 4U | 5U | 6U | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yonex Astrox 77 Tour | |||||
| Li-Ning Axforce 100 II |
String tension capacity affects how the shuttle feels on contact. Higher tension enhances precision but requires strength, while lower tension increases repulsion and shuttle height support.
Astrox 77 Tour is rated up to 29 lbs, while Axforce 100 II supports 31 lbs. A higher tension range suggests better control headroom for advanced setups, whereas lower tension limits may feel more user-friendly for newer players.
If you want sharper control and more direct response, the stiffer racket is preferable. If you prefer effortless power production during clears and rallies, the flexible option is easier to use over longer matches.
Yes. Yonex Astrox 77 Tour has a medium flex rating, while Li-Ning Axforce 100 II is stiff, making Yonex Astrox 77 Tour more flexible.
No. Both Yonex Astrox 77 Tour and Li-Ning Axforce 100 II have the same head heavy balance rating.
Both rackets offer 3U, 4U weight class options. Both rackets offer the same heaviest available option (3U).