Compare Yonex Nanoflare 800 Play vs Li-Ning Axforce 100 II

Yonex Nanoflare 800 Play
Li-Ning Axforce 100 II
Specification
Yonex
Nanoflare 800 Play
Li-Ning
Axforce 100 II
Flexmediumstiff
BalanceHead LightHead Heavy
Weight / Grip
4U / G5,G6
3U / G5
4U / G5
Max Tension
4U: 28 lbs
3U: 31 lbs
4U: 30 lbs

Nanoflare 800 Play vs Axforce 100 II - Technical Specification Comparison

Flex Comparison

The flex rating of a racket influences how power is generated and how the shuttle responds at contact. It plays a major role in playability, especially during smashes, drives, and defensive lifts.

Nanoflare 800 Play features a medium shaft, while Axforce 100 II uses a stiff shaft. Medium flex rackets provide a balance between accuracy and repulsion. They are well-suited for intermediate players transitioning to higher levels or those who want a racket that works for both power and control without specializing too strongly in one direction. By comparison, Stiff shafts suit players who already generate power with strong technique. They offer cleaner shuttle response, better directional accuracy on drives, and enable tighter placement during attacking play. However, they demand more physical input, so beginners may find them less forgiving if contact timing is late..

Players who hit with full-body rotation and strong wrist snap may benefit more from the characteristics of Axforce 100 II, while those who prefer rallies, longer games and effortless depth will appreciate the support offered by Axforce 100 II.

FlexibleMediumStiff
Nanoflare 800 Play
Axforce 100 II

Balance Comparison

Balance affects swing sensation, shot recovery, and how easily power transfers into the shuttle. Even a similar weight racket can feel completely different depending on where the mass is distributed.

Nanoflare 800 Play is head light, while Axforce 100 II is head heavy. Head-light rackets are faster to maneuver and excel in quick exchanges, drive battles and defensive reactions. They support front-court play, fast interceptions, and doubles reflex shots - ideal for players who rely on speed instead of raw smash power. On the other hand, Head-heavy rackets shift more mass toward the frame, increasing momentum behind smashes and clears. Players who dominate from the rear court or rely on offensive pressure benefit most. However, head-heavy setups may feel slower when switching quickly between forehand and backhand defense..

Because their balance philosophies differ, players will instantly notice a change in tempo and swing feel when switching between them - one racket may encourage attacking play from the rear court, while the other enhances quick exchanges and defense.

Head LightEvenHead Heavy
Yonex Nanoflare 800 Play
Li-Ning Axforce 100 II

Weight & Maneuverability

The weight class determines how quickly a racket moves during defense and how much stability it has during smashes. Lighter frames accelerate faster, while heavier ones provide more impact stability.

Nanoflare 800 Play is available in 4U while Axforce 100 II comes in 3U, 4U. A player choosing between them may decide based on whether they prioritize fast exchanges and net interceptions or power-focused shooting from the backcourt.

Lighter variants like 5U/6U emphasize maneuverability, especially valuable in doubles, defence and drive rallies. Meanwhile, 3U/4U variants carry more swing momentum, benefiting aggressive singles players who rely on steep smashes.

2U3U4U5U6U
Yonex Nanoflare 800 Play
Li-Ning Axforce 100 II

String Tension & Control Potential

String tension capacity affects how the shuttle feels on contact. Higher tension enhances precision but requires strength, while lower tension increases repulsion and shuttle height support.

Nanoflare 800 Play is rated up to 28 lbs, while Axforce 100 II supports 31 lbs. A higher tension range suggests better control headroom for advanced setups, whereas lower tension limits may feel more user-friendly for newer players.

Which One Should You Choose?

Choose the lighter model for fast defense and doubles pace. Choose the heavier model for stronger smash stability and backcourt dominance.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Yonex Nanoflare 800 Play more flexible than Li-Ning Axforce 100 II?

Yes. Yonex Nanoflare 800 Play has a medium flex rating, while Li-Ning Axforce 100 II is stiff, making Yonex Nanoflare 800 Play more flexible.

Is Yonex Nanoflare 800 Play more head-light than Li-Ning Axforce 100 II?

Yes. Yonex Nanoflare 800 Play has a head light balance, while Li-Ning Axforce 100 II is head heavy, making Yonex Nanoflare 800 Play more head-light.

Do Yonex Nanoflare 800 Play and Li-Ning Axforce 100 II have the same weight class options?

Both rackets offer 4U weight class options. Li-Ning Axforce 100 II also comes in 3U, which Yonex Nanoflare 800 Play does not. Overall, Li-Ning Axforce 100 II offers the heaviest available option (3U), while Yonex Nanoflare 800 Play's heaviest variant is 4U.