![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Specification | Apacs Z-Ziggler | Li-Ning Axforce 90 New |
| Flex | stiff | stiff |
| Balance | Head Heavy | Head Heavy |
| Weight / Grip | 4U / G1,G2 | 3U / G5 4U / G5 5U / G6 |
| Max Tension | 4U: 38 lbs | 3U: 31 lbs 4U: 30 lbs 5U: 29 lbs |
The flex rating of a racket influences how power is generated and how the shuttle responds at contact. It plays a major role in playability, especially during smashes, drives, and defensive lifts.
Both rackets share a stiff profile. This means that neither one has a built-in advantage regarding shaft bend behavior. Stiff shafts suit players who already generate power with strong technique. They offer cleaner shuttle response, better directional accuracy on drives, and enable tighter placement during attacking play. However, they demand more physical input, so beginners may find them less forgiving if contact timing is late. Users comparing these two rackets may instead feel differences more from balance, weight distribution, and string setup rather than flex alone.
| Flexible | Medium | Stiff | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Z-Ziggler | |||
| Axforce 90 New |
Balance affects swing sensation, shot recovery, and how easily power transfers into the shuttle. Even a similar weight racket can feel completely different depending on where the mass is distributed.
Both rackets share a head heavy balance profile, meaning their weight distribution philosophy is similar. Head-heavy rackets shift more mass toward the frame, increasing momentum behind smashes and clears. Players who dominate from the rear court or rely on offensive pressure benefit most. However, head-heavy setups may feel slower when switching quickly between forehand and backhand defense.. In this case, differences in performance will rely more on flex, weight class, and tension settings rather than balance alone.
| Head Light | Even | Head Heavy | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apacs Z-Ziggler | |||
| Li-Ning Axforce 90 New |
The weight class determines how quickly a racket moves during defense and how much stability it has during smashes. Lighter frames accelerate faster, while heavier ones provide more impact stability.
Z-Ziggler is available in 4U while Axforce 90 New comes in 3U, 4U, 5U. A player choosing between them may decide based on whether they prioritize fast exchanges and net interceptions or power-focused shooting from the backcourt.
Lighter variants like 5U/6U emphasize maneuverability, especially valuable in doubles, defence and drive rallies. Meanwhile, 3U/4U variants carry more swing momentum, benefiting aggressive singles players who rely on steep smashes.
| 2U | 3U | 4U | 5U | 6U | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apacs Z-Ziggler | |||||
| Li-Ning Axforce 90 New |
String tension capacity affects how the shuttle feels on contact. Higher tension enhances precision but requires strength, while lower tension increases repulsion and shuttle height support.
Z-Ziggler is rated up to 38 lbs, while Axforce 90 New supports 31 lbs. A higher tension range suggests better control headroom for advanced setups, whereas lower tension limits may feel more user-friendly for newer players.
Choose the lighter model for fast defense and doubles pace. Choose the heavier model for stronger smash stability and backcourt dominance.
No. Both Apacs Z-Ziggler and Li-Ning Axforce 90 New have the same stiff flex rating.
No. Both Apacs Z-Ziggler and Li-Ning Axforce 90 New have the same head heavy balance rating.
Both rackets offer 4U weight class options. Li-Ning Axforce 90 New also comes in 3U, 5U, which Apacs Z-Ziggler does not. Overall, Li-Ning Axforce 90 New offers the heaviest available option (3U), while Apacs Z-Ziggler's heaviest variant is 4U.