![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Specification | Li-Ning Axforce 80 | Li-Ning Halbertec 7000 |
| Flex | medium | medium |
| Balance | Head Heavy | Even |
| Weight / Grip | 3U / G5 4U / G5 5U / G6 | 3U / G5 4U / G5 |
| Max Tension | 3U: 31 lbs 4U: 30 lbs 5U: 29 lbs | 3U: 31 lbs 4U: 30 lbs |
The flex rating of a racket influences how power is generated and how the shuttle responds at contact. It plays a major role in playability, especially during smashes, drives, and defensive lifts.
Both rackets share a medium profile. This means that neither one has a built-in advantage regarding shaft bend behavior. Medium flex rackets provide a balance between accuracy and repulsion. They are well-suited for intermediate players transitioning to higher levels or those who want a racket that works for both power and control without specializing too strongly in one direction. Users comparing these two rackets may instead feel differences more from balance, weight distribution, and string setup rather than flex alone.
| Flexible | Medium | Stiff | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Axforce 80 | |||
| Halbertec 7000 |
Balance affects swing sensation, shot recovery, and how easily power transfers into the shuttle. Even a similar weight racket can feel completely different depending on where the mass is distributed.
Axforce 80 is head heavy, while Halbertec 7000 is even. Head-heavy rackets shift more mass toward the frame, increasing momentum behind smashes and clears. Players who dominate from the rear court or rely on offensive pressure benefit most. However, head-heavy setups may feel slower when switching quickly between forehand and backhand defense. On the other hand, Even-balance rackets sit between power and agility, offering adaptability in offense and defense. They suit all-round players who rotate between front and back court roles. While not extreme in either direction, they offer consistent response across most shot styles..
Because their balance philosophies differ, players will instantly notice a change in tempo and swing feel when switching between them - one racket may encourage attacking play from the rear court, while the other enhances quick exchanges and defense.
| Head Light | Even | Head Heavy | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Li-Ning Axforce 80 | |||
| Li-Ning Halbertec 7000 |
The weight class determines how quickly a racket moves during defense and how much stability it has during smashes. Lighter frames accelerate faster, while heavier ones provide more impact stability.
Axforce 80 is available in 3U, 4U, 5U while Halbertec 7000 comes in 3U, 4U. A player choosing between them may decide based on whether they prioritize fast exchanges and net interceptions or power-focused shooting from the backcourt.
Lighter variants like 5U/6U emphasize maneuverability, especially valuable in doubles, defence and drive rallies. Meanwhile, 3U/4U variants carry more swing momentum, benefiting aggressive singles players who rely on steep smashes.
| 2U | 3U | 4U | 5U | 6U | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Li-Ning Axforce 80 | |||||
| Li-Ning Halbertec 7000 |
String tension capacity affects how the shuttle feels on contact. Higher tension enhances precision but requires strength, while lower tension increases repulsion and shuttle height support.
Both models support up to 31 lbs, providing identical stringing headroom. Players tuning their rackets can achieve similar feel outcomes depending on the string gauge and tension chosen.
If you prioritize smashes and rear-court pressure, go for the head-heavy model. If you value quick defense and fast racket handling, the head-light model may feel more responsive.
No. Both Li-Ning Axforce 80 and Li-Ning Halbertec 7000 have the same medium flex rating.
No. Li-Ning Halbertec 7000 is more head-light with a even balance, while Li-Ning Axforce 80 is head heavy.
Both rackets offer 3U, 4U weight class options. Li-Ning Axforce 80 also comes in 5U, which Li-Ning Halbertec 7000 does not. Both rackets offer the same heaviest available option (3U).