![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Specification | Li-Ning Halbertec 4000 | Yonex Nanoflare 1000Z |
| Flex | medium | stiff |
| Balance | Even | Head Light |
| Weight / Grip | 3U / G5 4U / G5 | 3U / G4,G5,G6 4U / G5,G6 |
| Max Tension | 3U: 29 lbs 4U: 28 lbs | 3U: 29 lbs 4U: 28 lbs |
The flex rating of a racket influences how power is generated and how the shuttle responds at contact. It plays a major role in playability, especially during smashes, drives, and defensive lifts.
Halbertec 4000 features a medium shaft, while Nanoflare 1000Z uses a stiff shaft. Medium flex rackets provide a balance between accuracy and repulsion. They are well-suited for intermediate players transitioning to higher levels or those who want a racket that works for both power and control without specializing too strongly in one direction. By comparison, Stiff shafts suit players who already generate power with strong technique. They offer cleaner shuttle response, better directional accuracy on drives, and enable tighter placement during attacking play. However, they demand more physical input, so beginners may find them less forgiving if contact timing is late..
Players who hit with full-body rotation and strong wrist snap may benefit more from the characteristics of Nanoflare 1000Z, while those who prefer rallies, longer games and effortless depth will appreciate the support offered by Nanoflare 1000Z.
| Flexible | Medium | Stiff | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Halbertec 4000 | |||
| Nanoflare 1000Z |
Balance affects swing sensation, shot recovery, and how easily power transfers into the shuttle. Even a similar weight racket can feel completely different depending on where the mass is distributed.
Halbertec 4000 is even, while Nanoflare 1000Z is head light. Even-balance rackets sit between power and agility, offering adaptability in offense and defense. They suit all-round players who rotate between front and back court roles. While not extreme in either direction, they offer consistent response across most shot styles. On the other hand, Head-light rackets are faster to maneuver and excel in quick exchanges, drive battles and defensive reactions. They support front-court play, fast interceptions, and doubles reflex shots - ideal for players who rely on speed instead of raw smash power..
Because their balance philosophies differ, players will instantly notice a change in tempo and swing feel when switching between them - one racket may encourage attacking play from the rear court, while the other enhances quick exchanges and defense.
| Head Light | Even | Head Heavy | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Li-Ning Halbertec 4000 | |||
| Yonex Nanoflare 1000Z |
The weight class determines how quickly a racket moves during defense and how much stability it has during smashes. Lighter frames accelerate faster, while heavier ones provide more impact stability.
Both rackets are offered in similar weight categories (3U, 4U). Because weight classes align closely, power and speed differences will likely be subtle and influenced more by flex, balance and string setup than pure mass.
| 2U | 3U | 4U | 5U | 6U | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Li-Ning Halbertec 4000 | |||||
| Yonex Nanoflare 1000Z |
String tension capacity affects how the shuttle feels on contact. Higher tension enhances precision but requires strength, while lower tension increases repulsion and shuttle height support.
Both models support up to 29 lbs, providing identical stringing headroom. Players tuning their rackets can achieve similar feel outcomes depending on the string gauge and tension chosen.
Their specifications are closely matched. Your choice will come down to hand feel, string preference, brand confidence or budget.
Yes. Li-Ning Halbertec 4000 has a medium flex rating, while Yonex Nanoflare 1000Z is stiff, making Li-Ning Halbertec 4000 more flexible.
No. Yonex Nanoflare 1000Z is more head-light with a head light balance, while Li-Ning Halbertec 4000 is even.
Both rackets offer 3U, 4U weight class options. Both rackets offer the same heaviest available option (3U).