![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Specification | Li-Ning Halbertec 3000 | Li-Ning Halbertec 6000 |
| Flex | medium | medium |
| Balance | Even | Even |
| Weight / Grip | 4U / G5 | 4U / G5 5U / G6 |
| Max Tension | 4U: 28 lbs | 4U: 30 lbs 5U: 29 lbs |
The flex rating of a racket influences how power is generated and how the shuttle responds at contact. It plays a major role in playability, especially during smashes, drives, and defensive lifts.
Both rackets share a medium profile. This means that neither one has a built-in advantage regarding shaft bend behavior. Medium flex rackets provide a balance between accuracy and repulsion. They are well-suited for intermediate players transitioning to higher levels or those who want a racket that works for both power and control without specializing too strongly in one direction. Users comparing these two rackets may instead feel differences more from balance, weight distribution, and string setup rather than flex alone.
| Flexible | Medium | Stiff | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Halbertec 3000 | |||
| Halbertec 6000 |
Balance affects swing sensation, shot recovery, and how easily power transfers into the shuttle. Even a similar weight racket can feel completely different depending on where the mass is distributed.
Both rackets share a even balance profile, meaning their weight distribution philosophy is similar. Even-balance rackets sit between power and agility, offering adaptability in offense and defense. They suit all-round players who rotate between front and back court roles. While not extreme in either direction, they offer consistent response across most shot styles.. In this case, differences in performance will rely more on flex, weight class, and tension settings rather than balance alone.
| Head Light | Even | Head Heavy | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Li-Ning Halbertec 3000 | |||
| Li-Ning Halbertec 6000 |
The weight class determines how quickly a racket moves during defense and how much stability it has during smashes. Lighter frames accelerate faster, while heavier ones provide more impact stability.
Halbertec 3000 is available in 4U while Halbertec 6000 comes in 4U, 5U. A player choosing between them may decide based on whether they prioritize fast exchanges and net interceptions or power-focused shooting from the backcourt.
Lighter variants like 5U/6U emphasize maneuverability, especially valuable in doubles, defence and drive rallies. Meanwhile, 3U/4U variants carry more swing momentum, benefiting aggressive singles players who rely on steep smashes.
| 2U | 3U | 4U | 5U | 6U | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Li-Ning Halbertec 3000 | |||||
| Li-Ning Halbertec 6000 |
String tension capacity affects how the shuttle feels on contact. Higher tension enhances precision but requires strength, while lower tension increases repulsion and shuttle height support.
Halbertec 3000 is rated up to 28 lbs, while Halbertec 6000 supports 30 lbs. A higher tension range suggests better control headroom for advanced setups, whereas lower tension limits may feel more user-friendly for newer players.
Choose the lighter model for fast defense and doubles pace. Choose the heavier model for stronger smash stability and backcourt dominance.
No. Both Li-Ning Halbertec 3000 and Li-Ning Halbertec 6000 have the same medium flex rating.
No. Both Li-Ning Halbertec 3000 and Li-Ning Halbertec 6000 have the same even balance rating.
Both rackets offer 4U weight class options. Li-Ning Halbertec 6000 also comes in 5U, which Li-Ning Halbertec 3000 does not. Both rackets offer the same heaviest available option (4U).